If you are a private landlord in England trying to work out what the Renters' Rights Act means for how you run your portfolio going forward, this piece is not about the legislation itself. It is about the landlords who will navigate the new landlord rules well, what they are doing differently from those who will not, and what that looks like in practice across the areas that matter most.

Two kinds of landlord

After twenty years in the lettings industry, I have a reasonably clear picture of what separates landlords who consistently do well from those who consistently find it harder than it needs to be. It is not portfolio size. Some of the best-managed portfolios I have seen belong to people with one or two properties. Some of the most chaotic belong to people with fifteen. It is not how long they have been doing it. Experience helps, but experience of doing something incorrectly for twenty years is not the same as doing it properly for five. What separates them is something closer to attitude. The landlords who do well treat their rental properties as businesses. Not necessarily large or complicated businesses, but businesses nonetheless. With processes, with documentation, with a clear understanding of what good looks like, and with a willingness to stay current as the rules change. The ones who struggle treat it more like a passive investment. Something that mostly runs itself, with occasional intervention when something goes wrong. That approach worked better in a more permissive regulatory environment. Under the Renters' Rights Act, it is going to become increasingly difficult to sustain.

1. They sorted their deposits before they were asked to

The first thing I notice about the landlords who are in good shape right now is that they did not wait for someone to tell them to check their deposits. As I covered earlier in this series, deposit protection sits underneath every Section 8 possession claim. An incorrectly protected deposit, or a failure to serve the prescribed information correctly at the start of a tenancy, blocks most possession grounds before they get anywhere near a court. The landlords who are going to be caught out by this are the ones who have been assuming everything is fine without checking. The landlords who are not going to be caught out by these new landlord rules have already gone through every tenancy in their portfolio. They know which scheme each deposit is held with, when it was registered, and when the prescribed information was served. They have the documentation to prove it. Some of them found problems when they went through this exercise. They fixed them. That took time and in some cases cost money. But they did it before they needed to, rather than discovering the problem in the middle of a possession claim. That distinction matters more now than it ever has. The time to find a compliance problem is before it becomes the reason a legitimate claim fails. Renters Rights Act 2026: Everything Landlords Need To Know

2. They have stopped managing by instinct

The landlords who manage well in 2026 have processes rather than habits. There is a difference. A habit is something you do because you have always done it that way. A process is something you do because you have thought about what needs to happen, when it needs to happen, and how you will know it has been done correctly. Good landlords have a system for tracking safety certificate renewal dates. Not a mental note. A calendar reminder, a spreadsheet, something external that does not depend on them remembering. They have a clear record of when each tenancy started, what rent was agreed, when the last increase took effect, and when the next Section 13 notice can lawfully be served. They have a folder, physical or digital, for each tenancy, containing the signed agreement, the deposit protection confirmation, the prescribed information receipt, the inventory, and the key correspondence. None of that is sophisticated. It is basic organisation applied consistently. But the number of landlords who do not have it in place, and who discover they do not have it in place at the worst possible moment, is higher than you would expect. The Renters' Rights Act has not changed what good record-keeping looks like. It has changed the cost of not having it.

3. They understand the grounds before they need them

One of the clearest differences I see between landlords who manage well and those who do not is timing. The ones who manage well understand the tools available to them before they need to use them. The ones who struggle are the ones calling me in a panic when a situation has already developed to a point where the options are limited. Under the old regime, the Section 21 safety net meant that timing was less critical. You could be slow to understand your options, move through a difficult tenancy situation cautiously, and still have a relatively clean exit available if things deteriorate beyond the point of recovery. That safety net is gone. Under Section 8, the grounds that apply to your situation, the evidence those grounds require, and the notice periods attached to them are things you need to understand before a problem arises, not after. A landlord who discovers that their tenant is in serious arrears and then starts researching Section 8 grounds is already behind. The arrears need to have been documented, the communication trail needs to exist, and the deposit protection needs to be clean before any of that research is useful. Good landlords in 2026 know their grounds. They are not solicitors and they do not need to be. But they understand the broad categories well enough to know when a situation is developing in a direction that might require formal action, and they manage the documentation accordingly from the start rather than scrambling to construct it after the fact.

4. They think about tenant selection more carefully

The removal of Section 21 has sharpened the thinking of good landlords around tenant selection in ways that I think are genuinely positive for the sector. When recovering possession without cause was an available option, some landlords were less careful about who they let to than they should have been. The logic, conscious or not, was that a mistake could be corrected. A difficult tenant could be served a Section 21 notice and the problem resolved, slowly and expensively, but resolved. That logic is gone. Under Section 8, recovering possession from a tenant who has not done anything that meets the possession grounds is not an option. Which means the decision about who moves in carries more weight than it used to. The landlords who are thinking clearly about this in 2026 are investing more time in referencing. Not just ticking the boxes on a standard reference, but genuinely understanding the situation of the person they are about to enter a long-term contractual relationship with. Employment stability. Rental history. Affordability at current income levels and what happens to that affordability if circumstances change. Character references where appropriate. They are also thinking about the property itself. A well-presented, well-maintained property attracts a different pool of applicants than one that is showing its age. Landlords who have been deferring maintenance are starting to understand that the quality of the asset is directly connected to the quality of the tenant it attracts, and that connection matters more in a regime where the relationship is harder to exit.

5. They have made decisions about EPC ratings now

This one catches people off guard because the EPC requirement, which will require privately rented homes to achieve a minimum C rating, is not in the Renters' Rights Act and does not take effect until 2030. The landlords who are managing well have already started thinking about it anyway. The reason is straightforward. Retrofitting an older property to achieve an EPC C rating is not a small job. Depending on the property, it might involve insulation, heating system upgrades, window replacements, or combinations of all three. Doing that work in 2029, alongside every other landlord in the country who has left it to the last moment, is going to be more expensive, more disruptive, and harder to plan around than doing it now when there is time to make considered decisions. Good landlords have assessed the current EPC rating of every property in their portfolio. They know which properties are likely to require work and roughly what that work involves. Some have already started it, phasing improvements into their maintenance schedule rather than treating it as a future problem. Others have made the calculation that a specific property is not worth the investment required to bring it to standard and have decided to sell rather than upgrade. Both are legitimate decisions. What is not a legitimate decision, in the sense that it is likely to become an expensive one, is deciding not to think about it yet.

6. They have thought clearly about whether to stay self-managing

The best landlords I know have asked themselves honestly, in light of what the Renters' Rights Act requires, whether their current management approach is the right one for 2026 and beyond. Some of them have concluded yes. They have the systems, the knowledge, the time, and the appetite to manage properly under the new landlord rules, and they are going to continue doing so. They have updated their processes where needed, confirmed their compliance position, and moved on. Others have concluded that professional management makes more sense now than it did before. Not because they were managing badly, but because the compliance infrastructure that professional management provides has become more valuable as the cost of compliance failures has increased. They have made a clear-eyed assessment of what the management fee buys in the current environment and decided it is worth paying. A smaller number have looked at the whole picture, including the tax environment, the compliance requirements, and the ongoing legislative direction of travel, and decided that reducing their exposure to the sector makes sense for them. Some have sold, some have moved properties into limited company structures, some have switched to short-term letting arrangements where the legislation applies differently. All of those are reasonable outcomes from an honest assessment. What none of them did was avoid the question.

The pattern underneath all of it

If I had to identify a single characteristic that distinguishes the landlords who are going to do well in 2026 from those who are going to find it harder, it would be this: they treat the things they cannot control as fixed and focus their attention on the things they can. They cannot control the legislative environment and new landlord rules. The Renters' Rights Act is law. The EPC requirements are coming. The direction of travel is not reversing. Spending energy resenting those facts is energy not spent on managing the portfolio well. What they can control is the quality of their compliance. The quality of their documentation. The quality of the properties they offer. The quality of the tenant relationships they build. The quality of the decisions they make about whether to hold, sell, improve, or change their management approach. Those things, consistently done well, compound over time. A well-managed portfolio in a strong market, owned by a landlord who treats it seriously, is a genuinely good asset to hold. The Renters' Rights Act changes what it takes to manage one well. It does not change the underlying value of doing so. That is what good landlords are doing differently in 2026. Not panicking. Not pretending nothing has changed. Assessing their position honestly, sorting out the things that need sorting, and getting on with it.

FAQs

What does the Renters' Rights Act mean for landlords who have been managing properly?

For landlords who have clean compliance records, correct deposit protection, and a professional approach to management, the Act is an incremental change rather than a fundamental one. The process of recovering possession is more involved, rent increases require formal Section 13 notices, and the cost of compliance failures has increased. The fundamentals of good management remain the same.

What are the most important things a landlord can do to prepare for the Renters' Rights Act and new landlord rules?

Check every deposit in the portfolio for correct protection and prescribed information service. Understand the Section 8 grounds relevant to each tenancy. Ensure that rent increases will be executed through the Section 13 process from May 2026. Update referencing and tenant selection processes. Assess EPC ratings across the portfolio and begin planning any improvement works required to meet the 2030 minimum standard.

How does good tenant selection protect landlords under the new landlord rules?

With Section 21 abolished, recovering possession from a tenant who has not breached the tenancy in a way that meets a Section 8 ground is not possible. The decision about who moves in carries more weight than it did under the old regime. Thorough referencing, including employment stability, rental history, and genuine affordability assessment, reduces the risk of entering a tenancy that becomes difficult to exit.

Why should landlords think about EPC ratings now if the requirement does not apply until 2030?

Retrofitting properties to achieve EPC C ratings involves potentially significant work. Leaving it until 2029 means competing for contractors and materials alongside every other landlord in the country who has also left it late, at higher cost and with less time to plan. Landlords who assess their portfolio now and phase any required improvements into their maintenance schedule will manage the cost and disruption more effectively.

What record-keeping do landlords need in 2026?

For each tenancy: the signed agreement, deposit protection confirmation with registration date, prescribed information served to the tenant with evidence of service, current safety certificates, inventory, key correspondence, and a record of rent increase history including Section 13 notice dates and proposed start dates. Documentation should be organised so it can be produced quickly if a possession claim or Tribunal challenge requires it.

How has the importance of tenant selection changed under the Renters' Rights Act?

Significantly. Without Section 21, landlords cannot recover possession from a tenant who has not done anything that meets one of the Section 8 grounds. This means the initial decision about who occupies the property carries more long-term consequence than it did before. Good landlords are investing more time and rigour in referencing and assessment of prospective tenants as a direct result.

What separates landlords who manage well from those who struggle?

Consistently, the difference is whether a landlord treats their portfolio as a business with processes and documentation, or as a passive investment that mostly runs itself. Under the Renters' Rights Act, the operational demands on landlords have increased. The gap between those with proper systems and those without is going to widen as the new regime takes effect.

Is now a good time to sell a rental property?

That depends on individual circumstances including tax position, the quality and location of the asset, financing structure, and appetite for ongoing management. The Renters' Rights Act alone is not a sufficient reason to sell a well-located, well-managed property. For landlords with marginal assets, compliance challenges, or properties that will require significant investment to meet the 2030 EPC standard, a sale may make sense as part of a wider portfolio review.

Contact Miller Rose

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.